Search found 6 matches
- Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:19 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: LOC sort
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21729
Re: LOC sort
I see now where the confusion was. But I'm not sure you're right about the correct sorting. Sorting that way completely destroys the topical ordering of books (for instance, it puts random choral works between the piano works), I've never seen a library sort that way, and it's not how the LOC itself...
- Tue Mar 15, 2016 7:13 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: LOC sort
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21729
Re: LOC sort
I'm not sure I understand your response—it seems like you're saying that the LCC sorting is working already. I've attached a picture of how the sort works for my library: http://imgur.com/dPjyzza http://imgur.com/dPjyzza EDIT: On the other hand, your fix worked fine in the opposite direction, sendin...
- Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:18 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: LOC sort
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21729
Re: LOC sort
Bump/hello?
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:04 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Custom bottom-of-window statistics?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12940
Custom bottom-of-window statistics?
I have a custom field set up for "Number of items" (keeping track of multi-volume works). It would be lovely to be able to track that at the bottom of the window (currently, it lists the total number of titles as the number of "books," and can only display that and pages). Additi...
- Sun Dec 06, 2015 12:38 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: LOC sort
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21729
Re: LOC sort
Is this going to be fixed anytime soon? Or is there a way to manually change how the field is sorted?
- Thu Oct 15, 2015 5:52 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: LOC sort
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21729
LOC sort
Hi—I've just switched from Delicious Library, and I noticed that I can no longer sort properly by library of congress catalogue—the sort simply goes character by character, so that, for instance "B1290 2008" comes before "B188 .F714 1988". Is there any good solution for this?